Props to WSOC's Joe Bruno for noticing that Charlotte City Council has plans to discuss illegal truck parking at its annual retreat this month.
Councilmembers say they have seen an increase in complaints about trucks illegally parking on ramps and streets, particularly in Districts 2 and 4.
CP Post from Mid-December regarding the same is here.
I-485 Outer and Rea Road Exit 59.
“It is very annoying and just so unattractive,” Antoinette Mingo, a District 4 resident, said.
Antoinette Mingo says she is fed up with trucks parking on the side of streets and ramps and not just because they are unappealing, but also because of safety.
“The trucks are no tiny vehicles. Those are huge vehicles,” she said. “It is a safety issue.”
The city thinks so, as well. Councilmembers Renee Johnson and Malcolm Graham have been leading voices on the issue.
“We have to address this. Our residents have to know we are addressing semi-truck parking, grass and litter issues, specifically in District 4,” Johnson said. “We have a huge, huge problem in the city.”
“I think it is an immediate concern,” Graham said.
The city identified seven areas as problem spots where tractor-trailers are frequently found including on ramps to Interstate 485 in the University area, the Interstate 85 Connector and West Sugar Creek north of West W.T. Harris Boulevard.
According to Housing and Neighborhood Services, code violations have jumped from under 300 in 2019 to 830 in 2022. According to HNS, Code Enforcement does not have the authority to tow and a citation can only be issued if a previous notice of violation has been issued. Staff members are canvassing in the areas of concern at least two days a week.
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department did not respond to a request for comment on this story.
According to HNS, CMPD has been issuing parking citations, but the fine is only $25 and has “had little effect on the situation.” HNS says potential solutions include educational campaigns, no parking signs and making it easier to report violations.
Mayor Vi Lyles says the issue mainly stems from drivers having to pull over after hitting a certain number of hours on the road.
Mingo wishes they would park at rest areas or designated locations. She’s glad the city is looking for solutions.
“I am saying it is a city, a county and state problem because they should be working together for their constituents,” she said.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation says trucks are not allowed to park on ramps and posting no-parking signs are not required by law.
The transportation department says truck parking on ramps has become an ongoing maintenance expense due to the degradation of pavement. NCDOT says there also may be drop-offs from the edge of the pavement to the shoulder.
According to NCDOT, unless a truck is disabled or directed by law enforcement, it should not be parked on a ramp at any time.
Charlotte City Council member Ed Driggs, the long serving "Potted Plant" hasn't responded to email requests regarding the continuing hazard.
As Joe Bruno's story points out it is not just 485 and Rea Road, West Blvd on Ramp, Wilkinson near the Amazon Wearhouse and several locations on the east side of 485.
Driver's say that they hate rest areas and Flying "J" and Pilot truck stops are often full and charge a fee.to park usually 12 to 18 dollars in the Southeast. Both Rea and West Blvd. are low volume ramps during the small hours of the night and that also makes them attractive.
While CLT Council member Driggs is unresponsive NC DOT was quick to point out that the problem is the North Carolina SHP's responsibility:
Because these tractor trailers are not construction vehicles as part of the (485 Toll Road) project, we do not have the authority to remove them from the shoulder. However, I have contacted the NC highway patrol and they are able to police that from happening. Hopefully they will stay on top of it. If you have any more comments or questions, please do not hesitate to respond.
Thanks,
Brian Davis
Resident Engineer
NC DOT in this regard has been surprisingly efficient, at least in a response. CP suspects that if left to CLTCC they will treat it as they do the panhandlers, that is do nothing.